What Happens When Schools Ban What Students Will Need?

Schools Announce Sweeping Ban on Working With Other People

In a bold effort to preserve independent thinking, one of the nation’s largest school districts announced that students will no longer be allowed to work with other people at school.

The new policy prohibits students from asking classmates for help, discussing ideas, dividing responsibilities, brainstorming together, or seeking input before completing a task.

The concern?

Students might become too dependent on others.

If a student receives help solving a problem, educators may not know whether the student could have solved it alone. If students brainstorm together, someone might contribute an idea another student didn't think of independently. And allowing students to divide complex work among a team could prevent each student from mastering every part of the process themselves.

There is, admittedly, one potential problem with this approach.

The real world works almost entirely through collaboration.

Businesses expect it. Hospitals depend on it. Engineers rely on it.

Nearly every modern workplace expects employees to know how to ask good questions, evaluate other people's ideas, contribute their own expertise, and work together to accomplish something they couldn't accomplish alone.

But perhaps students can learn those skills later. After they graduate.

Sounds ridiculous, right?

OF COURSE we wouldn't ban collaboration because students could misuse it. We'd teach them the difference between collaboration and copying.

We'd set boundaries. We'd create expectations. We'd teach responsible use. We'd give students opportunities to practice while knowledgeable adults were still there to guide them.

And yet, we don't always take that same approach with technology.

When a new tool disrupts the way we've always taught, why is our first instinct to restrict it, block it, or ban it? We worry students will become dependent on it. We worry they'll take shortcuts. We worry they won't learn the skills we've traditionally valued.

And sometimes those concerns are completely valid.

But potential misuse isn't the same thing as having no educational value.

We've seen this conversation before with calculators, the internet, smartphones, search engines, and countless other tools. Today, we're having it again with AI and student technology at large.

AI will be part of the colleges, careers, and workplaces our students enter. So will technology we haven't even invented yet.

That doesn't mean every technology belongs in every lesson. It doesn't mean students need unrestricted access to every tool. And it certainly doesn't mean we stop teaching them to think, write, calculate, research, communicate, or create for themselves.

It means we have more to teach.

We need to teach students how to choose the right tool for the job. How to question what technology gives them. How to recognize when information is inaccurate or biased. How to protect their privacy. How to use digital tools ethically. How to recognize when technology is helping their thinking and when it's replacing it.

And, with AI specifically, how to use an incredibly powerful tool without handing their thinking over to it.

Those skills don't magically appear when students graduate.

They require guidance. Boundaries. Practice. Mistakes. Reflection. And adults willing to teach them.

The technologies will change. Our responsibility to prepare students for the world they'll actually enter shouldn't.

So perhaps the question isn't, “How do we keep students from using these tools?” Perhaps it’s,

“If students will be expected to navigate technology and AI responsibly in the world we're preparing them for, where exactly are they supposed to learn how, if not at school?”

Inspiration: Nation’s largest school district bans AI in the classroom through 8th grade

#IntentionalTech